I recently received the 55" MU8000 TV, and it's definitely a big step up from the KU6300 I previously had in every way. However, there are some issues that should be. Get access to helpful solutions, how-to guides, owners' manuals, and product specifications for your 2013 LED Smart TV (F7100 Series) from Samsung US Support. The Samsung JU7100 is a great 4k LED TV. With the exception of the discoloration it gets when viewed at an angle, it has impressive picture quality. It is also a. How to Turn Demo/Shop Mode Off on the 2015 4K UHD TV. Changing the Use Mode to Home Use Press the MENU/123 button on the remote. Navigate to and select Menu. The Samsung JU7500 is a great 4k UHD TV. It's especially good for gaming, due to its incredible motion handling. Its main downside is that the picture quality de. Samsung JU7. 10. 0 Review (UN4. JU7. 10. 0, UN5. 0JU7. Both Series 7 and Series 8 models are equipped with Auto Motion Plus. Models with this technology are capable of changing the picture on screen much faster than. JU7100 Series 4K UHD TV The Samsung JU7100 Series 4K UHD Smart TV allows you to feel the drama of blacker blacks and brighter brights with striking crispness. The following features are common to all models in the GeForce 7 series except the GeForce 7100, which lacks GCAA: Intellisample 4.0; Scalable Link. UN5. 5JU7. 10. 0, UN6. JU7. 10. 0, UN6. 5JU7. UN7. 5JU7. 10. 0, UN8. JU7. 10. 0)2. 02 ANSWERED QUESTIONS. Additional Review Notes. LED Clear Motion. This TV has a backlight strobing mode, which can be enabled by setting 'Auto Motion Plus' to 'Custom', and 'LED Clear Motion' to 'On'. This reduces the apparent blur, but adds flickering and darkens the screen. Unfortunately, you cannot turn on that feature in game mode, so it is useless for gaming due to the high input lag. Difference between sizes. We tested the 5. 5. As with all Samsung TVs (and a lot of other brands too), the panel provenance varies between sizes. We do not expect a significant difference between them in terms of picture quality (with the exception of the uniformity, which is more of a problem on bigger TVs). Let us know if you got one with significantly different results from ours, and we will update our review. Have any suggestions for the fix? As a first step, try disabling the 'Auto Motion Plus' feature and see if that helps. I own both brands and tend to prefer Sony, but would appreciate your advice. This may be a deal- breaker. It's seven feet long. The game mode suffers from judder spikes every 1. You should really let your viewers know that this version of the TV should be avoided at all costs if you plan to game with it. Thanks for letting us know. We'll investigate further and add a note to our review. It seems similar to the 7. There is no obvious differences from the specs but it seems to come with a standard remote instead of the smart one. It would be expected tu use lesser quality panels too so screen uniformity wouldn't be on par with the JU7. Without testing it, this is as much as we can tell. Would you expect the picture quality to still be on par with this set? Or perhaps even better? Also will you please review one of the new LG 4k TV's? We expect the exact same picture quality on it, and we will confirm this in a few weeks when we review it. We currently have 3 new LG TVs here, but they are 1. We will get to a 4k LG probably in about a month or so. Update: The review of the JU7. Short answer: get the cheaper of the two because their picture quality are in the same ballpark. Long answer: Even though the picture quality is about the same, there are other differences that might swing you one way or another: The JU7. HDMI inputs on the TV, only via the One Connect Mini. The HU8. 55. 0 does, and you can also connect a One Connect (sold separately). The JU7. 10. 0 doesn't come with 3. D glasses (4 for the HU8. The JU7. 10. 0 has the new smart TV OS (called Tizen). The HU8. 50. 0 is slightly thinner and has a smaller bezel. The HU8. 55. 0 doesn't support VP9 codec (though Samsung could add VP9 with the 2. Evolution Kit). What type of cable is it? There is also a lot of other proof of this on the internet. When we tried using a cheap 3ft HDMI 1. TV was in PC mode and 'UHD Color' was set to 'On.' Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have updated the review accordingly. Any idea how to find out which panel mine might have? Vizio's that use IPS instead of VA panels can be identified by the fourth character of the S/N, for example. If, yes, what other multi- channel formats will it pass? Thanks, as always! If you look at our DSE pattern, you can see the grid of the LEDs of the backlight. It's likely the 6. Can you explain something to me about HDMI cables? There are conflicting opinions out there. When they have almost the same specs? Is my Monster cable no longer good? We were able to transfer a 4k @ 6. HDMI cable. Does it have a 1. Specifically the 8. Are there any features in the new SUHD TV's that are worth me waiting for? We haven't tested them out, so we don't know how big of a difference that will make, but we expect it won't be a significant one for non- HDR content. I am mainly looking for a TV that handles fast- paced action scenes, football and basketball, and video games. Would you recommend this TV or another? It has good contrast and uniformity, good motion handling, and good upscaling capabilities, so action scenes and sports will look great. It also has low input lag, so it's a good choice for gaming. As in, can I use the gaming setting while connected with a PC? I do mostly PC gaming and would love the lower input lag. Both settings turn off many of the processing features on the TV. PC will let you get Chroma 4: 4: 4, but doesn't result in a significant decrease in input lag. Game mode drops input lag very low, but doesn't get you Chroma 4: 4: 4. Originally it was a subjective test, but now we automatically calculate the standard deviation of the values of the pixels. Our new test more accurately reflects the uniformity. Some people don't mind it at all, but if you walk past the TV you will definitely see the color shift. All I can say is WOW! Did a lot of research and rting. THANKS! I'm an engineer and was concerned about a few things: viewing angle, sunlight glare, and upconversion as nearly all sources will be upconverted. This TV is fantastic and I'm not easily impressed. Enjoy the new TV! Show us a picture where the Vizio M- series has text that is not as sharp as the Samsung TVs when both TVs are receiving a 4: 4: 4 signal. It tests for a whole host of things including 1: 1 pixel mapping, bit depth, chroma subsampling, and color gamut. The issue is that you can't tell from that test pattern what aspect or aspects are actually failing and which aren't. However, those TVs are actually 4: 4: 4 and don't show any of the typical signs of 4: 2: 2 or 4: 2: 0 like color bleeding and rainbows with text at all. However, they fail that specific test pattern for other reasons that aren't issues for normal monitor uses. However, in reality if you actually tried to use the TVs that you said were 4: 2: 2 or lower as a monitor you would see that they don't have any of the chroma subsampling issues that you claim they do. That is not to say that there aren't differences between the Samsung and Vizio TVs. There are most definitely issues with Vizio. However, 4: 4: 4 is not one of those issues. That can affect that test pattern you are using. That is why you have to turn on . If you are only testing for 4: 4: 4 you wouldn't have to turn on . All of those things could cause the TV to fail the test despite it being able to display 4: 4: 4 color sampling and some of those things won't be an issue for the majority of your readers. Here are a few pictures to illustrate our point. M6. 0- C3. 4k @ 3. Hz. 4: 2: 2. UN5. JU7. 10. 04k @ 6. Hz (Outside PC mode)4: 2: 0. UN5. 5JU7. 10. 04k @ 6. Hz (PC mode)4: 4: 4. You can see above that the Vizio makes the text look exactly like 4: 2: 2 on a Samsung TV in 4k @ 3. Hz outside PC mode. It is clearer than 4: 2: 0, but not as clear as 4: 4: 4. When we test for chroma, we always make sure to eliminate other aspects from the test, like 1: 1 pixel mapping or color gamut. Note that this only really matters when you use it as a PC monitor. It does not matter at all for movies/sports/TV shows. The UNxx. JU7. 10. UNxx. HU8. 55. 0? Looking at the 7. It is definitely the sharpest by far so why the lower score? The reason the JU7. Check out the Clearness pictures posted in the Q& A section of the Sony X8. C review. You can see exactly the impact of the backlight on the clarity of a picture, so the Sony can achieve the same look as Samsung for this. Not everyone likes that look, which is why we only rate how fast the pixels can transition from one color to another, and not how the backlight behaves. Apples vs apples, which TV is better? K picture and upscaling is my main priority. Should I exchange for a Sony? Both TVs are equally good at upscaling 1. Samsung is a lot better at upscaling 4. Otherwise, keep the Samsung. The picture quality actually looked better on the ju. Is this possible? With both TVs calibrated, they would look similar. The un. 55ju. 71. I don't know if I should get the UN4. JU6. 50. 0 vs UN4. H6. 40. 0 vs UN4. J6. 30. 0 vs UN4. JU7. 10. 0? I am not sure if I need to spend a few extra $$ on a 4k TV if it is not going to be too advantageous. My viewing distance won't be more than 1. At that size and distance, it's unlikely you would notice a big difference between 1. H6. 40. 0 or J6. 30. They have similar picture quality; the main difference is that the H6. D. Go with the cheaper option if you don't care about those options. It would be a deal breaker for me. Which is better in terms of picture quality? Is the newer model markedly superior for HDTV viewing in any of these respects, or are they essentially the same? If 4. K is not a major consideration, would one lose out in a significant way on picture quality by buying an H7. JU7. 10. 0? If you don't care about 4k, the H7. The 4. K feature is equivocal for my viewing distances. Are there any other significant differences in picture quality or performance between the H7. J7. 10. 0. Please confirm. Also, I see you lowered the black uniformity rating? Great website, thanks. The new score is more accurate. I really enjoyed your videos from last year. We're hoping to have a few up by the end of next month. I read today that Samsung released a firmware update for HDMI 2. A to all of its 2. SUHD and UHD TVs. I just got the UN6. JU7. 10. 0. Does this apply to my TV as well? This firmware update gives the ability to pass HDR content over HDMI. If this is true, then the JU7. HDR content, correct? It may be able to play HDR content, but it doesn't have HDR functionality (the ability to brighten highlights of the picture), so it won't do HDR as well as Samsung's SUHD TVS (the JS* line). For example, the W8. B black uniformity image looks significantly better than this TV, yet it earned a lower score (8. Is there a new rating scale? Or perhaps increased exposure when taking the picture? If you don't, 4: 4: 4 probably isn't important for you. It has somewhat better uniformity, which is good for movies and TV. It's likely that the JS8. Apart from that, the picture quality should be in line with the JU7. Ge. Force 7 series - Wikipedia. The Ge. Force 7 Series is the seventh generation of Nvidia's Ge. Forcegraphics processing units. This was the last series available on AGP cards. The Ge. Force 7 supports hardware acceleration for H. Windows by Adobe Flash Player until the Ge. Force 8 Series. This series supports only PCI Express interface. Only one model, the 7. GS, is available. As it is little more than a revamped version of the Ge. Force 6. 20. 0TC, it is designed as a basic PCI- e solution for OEMs to use if the chipset does not have integrated video capabilities. It comes in a PCI Express Graphics Bus and 5. MB DDR2 VRAM. Performance specification. Graphics Bus: PCI Express. Memory Interface: 6. Memory Bandwidth: 5. GB/s. Fill Rate: 1. Vertex/s: 2. 63 million. Memory Type: DDR2 with TCGe. Force 7. 20. 0 series. It is designed to offer a low- cost upgrade from integrated graphics solutions. This series supports only PCI Express interface. Only one model, the 7. GS, is available. It has two pixel pipelines. Nvidia stated that the 7. GS performance is 5. Ge. Force 7 Series and of the Ge. Force 6 Series but supports HDR and Nvidia Pure. Video. NVIDIA Ge. Force 7. 20. 0 GS desktop Graphics Processing Unit was launched in January 2. The GPU uses Second Generation Cine. FX Shading architecture, and it is manufactured on 9. The card's graphics frequency is 4. MHz. It also has 2 pixel shaders, 4 texture units, together with 2 ROPs. The Ge. Force 7. 20. GS embeds 2. 56 MB of DDR2 memory, utilizing 6. The memory is clocked at 4. MHz, which results in 6. GB/s memory bandwidth. The GPU supports PCI Express 1. Ge. Force 7. 30. 0 series. Currently, 4 models are available: the 7. GT, the 7. 30. 0 GS, the 7. LE, and the 7. 30. SE. In many ways, this card is actually inferior to the 7. GS, although it still retains the HDR support. Ge. Force 7. 30. 0 LE. It has DDR2 memory, and a slightly lower core clock speed (4. MHz vs. It is only available in the PCI Express interface. ASUS have produced a 7. LE core, running it at 5. MHz rather than 4. MHz. Ge. Force 7. GS. Better performance than the 7. SE/LE. Ge. Force 7. GT. It has either 1. MB or 2. 56 MB of dedicated video memory, however it also supports Turbo. Cache, giving it up to 5. MB of video memory. It has DDR2 type memory and uses 6. The card also has 5. MHz core clock speed and 2. MHz or 3. 24 MHz memory clock speed (5. MHz or 6. 48 MHz effective). Currently, two Models are available and these are Ge. Force 7. 60. 0 GT and 7. GS. This new GPU assumed the place of the Ge. Force 6. 60. 0 GT, which had been around for quite some time. The AGP version was introduced on July 2. According to Nvidia, this card is identical to the PCI- e version other than the interface. In addition, the AGP version uses Nvidia's AGP- PCIe bridge chip. Preliminary testing showed that the Ge. Force 7. 60. 0 GS outperforms a Ge. Force 6. 60. 0 GT and ATI's counterpart, the ATI Radeon X1. Pro. It was made to provide a Geforce 7 series card to the mass market. Some companies released AGP versions. It incorporates memories (ddr. Not much is known about this card, other than that it uses the 8. Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 series. This series was discontinued and replaced with the 7. A total of 4 models were available: Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GTX 5. Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GTX, Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GT, and Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GS. It has 2. 0 pixel pipelines, 7 vertex shaders, 1. ROPs and a 4. 00 MHz core clock, 5. MHz memory clock (1 GHz effective) using GDDR3 memory. The Ge. Force 7. 80. GT had been introduced as a more affordable alternative to the 7. GTX. At the time it was considered the performance/cost champion of video cards. Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GS AGP. It has 1. 6 pixel shader units instead of the 2. GT has, but still benefits from the optimizations of the other 7- series GPUs enjoy. Clock speeds are 3. MHz for the GPU and 1. MHz for the (GDDR3) memory. According to all benchmark tests, the performance of this card is faster than the Ge. Force 6. 80. 0 GT and Ge. Force 6. 80. 0 Ultra. Different vendors may deviate from the stated specification. It serves to provide a great upgrade path for those with high- end AGP systems who don't want to switch to a new high- end PCI- Express system. Unlike a standard 7. GS, the 7. 80. 0 GS+ actually used a 7. GT GPU that had the full 2. GS video card. Gainward had previously released a . Its external appearance and name make it nearly indistinguishable from the 7. GT- based Bliss 7. GS 5. 12. MB GS+. Leadtek produced a similar card with 2. MB memory. In late 2. Gainward released a third '7. GS' card with 2. 0 pixel shaders running at 5. MHz core and 1. 40. MHz memory called the . This card is also based on the 7. GS core. There are no after- market cooling systems for the 7. GS, stock cooling in the Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GS AGP is adequate. The board layout is radically different from other Ge. Force 7 boards so no universal aftermarket coolers would fit without significant modification to their mounting mechanisms. Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GTX. The Ge. Force 7. 80. GTX supported the highest specification Direct. X 9 vertex and pixel shaders, at the time: Version 3. It was natively a PCI Express chip. SLI support had been retained and improved from the previous generation. According to PC World, the 7. GTX was . The GPU had 3. Athlon 6. 4 X2 4. CPU has 2. 33. 2 million transistors), along with 2. The card features more than simply an increased frame buffer from 2. MB to 5. 12 MB. The card features a much improved core clock speed of 5. MHz vs. 4. 30 MHz (2. GDDR3 memory clocked at 1. GHz vs. 1. 2 GHz (4. Like ATI's X1. 80. XT, the addition of another 2. MB of memory, and to a lesser extent, the increased clock speeds, have raised the heat and power output significantly. To combat this, the Ge. Force 7. 80. 0 GTX 5. MB version. Officially, this series was meant to support only PCI Express Interface but some companies released AGP versions. A total of 5 models have been developed and are available: 7. GX2, 7. 90. 0 GTX, 7. GT, 7. 90. 0 GTO and 7. GS. Features. In addition to the standard Ge. Force 7 Series features, the 7. Ge. Force 7. 90. 0 GS. The card was unofficially launched August 2. However, the product's company, MSI, made claims that these cards were stolen from MSI during transportation and sold to woot! As of March 2. 00. Nvidia had discontinued production of a number of Ge. Force 6 and 7 series products, including the 7. GS. The Ge. Force 7. GS has 2. 0 pixel processors, 7 vertex processors, 2. MHz/1. 32. 0 MHz for core/memory, which should provide slightly lower performance than the 7. GT. The Ge. Force 7. GS is powered by the graphics chip code- named G7. G7. 1 did over its immediate predecessor G7. DVI outputs, reduced power consumption, higher performance. Like the 7. 90. 0 GTX, it uses the G7. GPU that is produced at 9. It too offers all the features of the 7. Due to shortages of memory modules for the 5. MB GTX, more readily available 1. MHz memory was used. Ge. Force 7. 90. 0 GTO. At the time of launch, GTO boards sold for around US$2. GTX boards that cost in excess of $4. The GTO was essentially identical to the GTX, with the exception that it lacked HDCP and VIVO support, had underclocked memory running at 1. MHz, and used tighter memory timings. Other than that, the two boards were identical: same PCB, same cooler, same GPU. The GTO used extremely fast 1. Samsung BJ1. 1 GDDR3 memory running at 1. V, as opposed to the 2. V it is rated at. Clock speeds on the two cards are identical, at 6. MHz. At stock memory speeds, most comparisons found the GTO to lag behind the GTX by roughly a 5- 1. The majority of owners find that their GTO will overclock to 1. MHz memory speeds, despite the under- volted RAM. Many flash their GTO to a GTX BIOS to officially make it a GTX. GTO owners having trouble reaching GTX speeds with BIOS version 5. BIOS version such as 5. The GTO was an extremely popular card among enthusiasts as it offered near GTX performance at a considerably lower price. It was a limited production card aimed at cleaning out G7. G8. 0, and only spent about a month in retail channels before selling out. Ge. Force 7. 90. 0 GX2. This enables quad- SLI on two PCI Express x. Other OEM companies have access to the GX2 and it is now available from numerous vendors. The card features a 5. MHz GPU and 1. 20. MHz effective RAM speed. Although the power of the GX2 is less than the 7. GTX, each card is more powerful than the 7. GT. Many issues in this implementation of a dual- GPU unit convinced Nvidia to restrict its sale to OEM companies. The card is extremely long, with only the largest e- ATXcases being able to hold it. Two of the cards operating in quad- SLI also required extremely well designed airflow to function, and demanded a 1. Ge. Force 7. 95. 0 series. Officially, this series was meant to support only PCI Express Interface but some companies released AGP versions. Announced with a 5. MHz core clock, 7. MHz (1. 40. 0 MHz effective) memory clock, 2. MB GDDR3 memory and HDCP support. At an introductory price of US$3. Ge. Force 7. 95. 0 GT replaces the older Ge. Force 7. 90. 0 GT and improves performance: the Ge. Force 7. 95. 0 GT has a fillrate of 1. Megatexels/s and a memory bandwidth of 4. GB/s (versus 1. 08. Megatexels/s and 9. Megavertices/s for the 7. GT). Ge. Force 7. GX2. Unlike the 7. GX2 before it, this version is available to consumers directly. MB of memory per GPU, for a total of 1 GB, however total performance is more in line with 5. MB since each GPU can only access its own memory and not the memory of the other one. It does not offer any advantages over single- GPU cards with 5. MB, memory wise. This card is designed for the DIY market; it addresses many problems which the previous 7. GX2 had suffered from, such as noise, size, power consumption, and price. The 7. 95. 0 GX2 requires only a single PCIe power connector, in contrast to the twin- connectors of its predecessor; technically, this is understandable, as there is no need for a ring bus configuration – frames need only be passed on to the primary GPU. It is much shorter, fitting easily in the same space as a 7.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |